The Problem with Validation

Posted by Dan Eastwell Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:46:50 GMT

It’s been a long struggle, but finally accessible, and by extension valid, web pages are the norm, with innaccessible HTML and CSS banished to the last millenium

However, as with all goals, there can be the tendency for them to go too far and for the means to become more important than the means.

As a result, there’s a tendency to treat the WCAG as rules, rather than the guidelines they are.

The guidelines are littered with 'where appropriate's 'may's and 'until user agent's, thus you can’t, and really shouldn’t treat them as normative, let alone as pseudo-legal, documents

I've not been on the sharp end of this in any great way, yet, but it would be odd to not get a sign-off on a project just because of a spurious validation error. This is especially significant as validators don't necessarily come up with the same results each time.

Posted in , , , ,  | no comments | 1 trackback

Comments

Trackbacks

Use the following link to trackback from your own site:
http://www.thoughtballoon.co.uk/blog/trackbacks?article_id=the-problem-with-validation&day=21&month=06&year=2006

  1. From The Thought Balloon
    Should we sign the Accessibility E-Petition?
    "We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to ensure that any website launched by the government complies with accessibility standards (WCAG AA at least):" http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/govaccessibility/ Sounds worthwhile, doesn't it? I, however...

(leave url/email »)

   Comment Markup Help Preview comment